Este sitio web tiene ciertas restriucciones de navegación. Le recomendamos utilizar buscadores como: Edge, Chrome, Safari o Firefox.

The OUMERE October Edition Arrives October 1st, 2025. Quantities Limited

Cart 0

¡Felicidades! Su pedido está calificado para el envío libre You are 80 away from free shipping.

Receive a complimentary OUMERE Travel Set with this order. Add $600 worth of OUMERE to your cart, add one Travel Set and enter the code TRAVELSET at checkout to receive your OUMERE gift.

No hay más productos disponibles para comprar

Productos
Par con
Add your Travel Set
Costo sin impuestos Gratis
Antes de los impuestos y gastos de envío.

Low molecular weight hyaluronic acid cannot hold its own weight in water

Low molecular weight hyaluronic acid cannot hold its own weight in water - O U M E R E

 

 

 

Hyaluronic Acid Does Not Hold 1000× Its Weight in Water

OUMERE Research Brief • Author: Wendy Ouriel, M.S. • Published: Oct 12, 2025 • Reading time: 5–7 min

A prior OUMERE experiment visually estimated hyaluronic acid (HA) water-binding at ~10×–100×, contradicting the widely repeated “1000×” marketing claim. That preliminary work lacked a quantitative saturation definition. This brief reports updated, quantitative measurements demonstrating that the 1000× figure is unsupported and, for extra-low molecular weight HA, retention can fall below 1×.


Abstract

We assessed water-holding capacity of cosmetic-range HA (80,000–1,000,000 Da) using density, specific gravity, and rheometry to determine gel and saturation points. No sample achieved 1000× retention. Typical ranges measured were ~10×–100× depending on molecular weight distribution and test conditions. Extra-low MW HA (80–110 kDa) failed to retain its own weight (i.e., <1 g water per 1 g HA). Full manuscript is in preparation for peer review.

Methods (Summary)

  • Materials: HA lots spanning 80 kDa to 1 MDa (cosmetic range).
  • Procedure: Stepwise water addition; measurements of density & specific gravity; oscillatory rheometry to identify gelation and saturation transition points.
  • Endpoints: Operational gel point; saturation (no further water incorporation without structural failure/phase separation); calculated retention ratio (g water / g HA).

Results

Key findings
  • No HA sample achieved 1000× water retention.
  • Measured capacity typically fell within ~10×–100×, varying with molecular weight and matrix conditions.
  • Extra-low MW (80–110 kDa): could not retain 1× its weight in water.
  • Lower MW fragments were not inherently “more hydrating.”

No Scientific Basis for the 1000× Claim

We found no peer-reviewed study validating the “1000×” assertion. The phrase appears to be a legacy marketing line repeated without primary evidence. Quantitative testing here does not support it.

Discussion

HA’s water-binding capacity is finite and formulation-dependent. Smaller fragments can underperform. These findings argue for evaluating complete formulations that support barrier function and water balance, rather than relying on exaggerated single-ingredient claims.


FAQ

Does HA ever reach 1000×? No sample in this cosmetic-weight range achieved it under the quantitative criteria used.

Should consumers avoid HA? Not necessarily. Evaluate the whole formula, pH, and complementary ingredients. Avoid sensitizers and rely on barrier-supportive systems.

What’s next? Full dataset (curves and tables) will be released in the peer-reviewed manuscript. A plain-language summary will be posted for open access.


Related OUMERE Research